What Happened in Ashley Hollow. An Oral History



(Collected and edited by L. D. Merrill)


1. The Door


Maggie Tuttle, former clerk:

It started with the vault door. People think it’s a metaphor, but it was a real damn door — steel, painted mint green, the color of old hospitals. I’d been town clerk for twenty seven years. I knew every key in that place. Then one morning I came in, and my key didn’t work.


No one told me I was locked out. I just found out by trying the handle.


Earl Pinney, road-crew foreman:

Word went around fast. “Maggie got herself locked out.” You could feel something brewing. Around here, the smallest thing — like who gets the snowplow contract — turns into a holy war.



2. The First Selectman


Reporter, Ashford Ledger:

Brent Oller came in promising order. He said the town needed “professionalization.” He was clean-cut, ex-military, full of slogans. Folks liked that. But it didn’t take long before “professional” started to sound like “mine.”


Sarah M., former assessor:

At first, Brent would drop by my office just to “check in.” Then he started asking who came in to see me, what papers they filed. Always polite, always smiling — but you could feel the edge under it.


Anonymous town-hall staffer:

After Maggie was locked out, Brent called it a “security measure.” Then, later that week, the police showed up to “escort” her off the property. That’s when I knew: this wasn’t about paperwork anymore. It was about power.



3. The Meetings


Ruth Fenimore, selectman:

The Board meetings got tense. You’d think we were debating national security, not road-salt budgets. Brent ran the gavel hard — cut people off, said we were “off-topic” if we brought up the clerk’s office.


Town resident (name withheld):

We stopped speaking at the microphone. You’d see Brent writing notes when someone complained. Next day, that person’s permit would be delayed, or they’d get a random inspection at their business. Coincidence? Maybe. But a lot of coincidences add up.



4. The Rumors


Reporter:

We started hearing stories — documents disappearing, shredders running after hours. Nobody could prove anything. But that’s the trick of small-town corruption: it’s not about envelopes of cash. It’s about access. Who gets the keys, who gets the silence.


Maggie Tuttle:

I never shredded a thing that wasn’t approved. But once Brent started whispering that I had, I was done. Truth doesn’t travel far in a town of 3,000 — gossip gets there first.



5. The Divide


High-school teacher:

The town split right down the middle. At the diner, you could tell which side of the room people were on by where they sat. Brent’s people near the window, Maggie’s near the counter. Families stopped talking. The church bake sale got canceled because nobody could agree on who’d handle the money.


Earl Pinney:

That’s how you know it’s gone bad — when people stop waving. Around here, waving’s automatic. But when things turned ugly, even that felt political.



6. The Turning Point


Ruth Fenimore:

We called a special meeting to vote on making the clerk, tax collector, and treasurer appointed instead of elected. Brent said it would “streamline governance.” What he meant was he’d control the hiring.


The night of the vote, the hall was packed. Old farmers, young parents, people who hadn’t been to a meeting in twenty years. Brent stood up front, all smiles. But when people started shouting, that smile twitched.


The motion failed. Barely. And that’s when things got worse.



7. The Aftermath


Anonymous staffer:

One morning, Maggie came back — said she just needed to get her personal files. Brent called the cops again. Watching a woman in her sixties get walked out of Town Hall like a criminal… that broke something in this place.


Reporter:

After that, employees started quitting. The assistant clerk, the tax collector, the treasurer. Brent said they were “seeking new opportunities.” Most of us knew they were escaping.


Earl Pinney:

Now Town Hall feels like a ghost building. Lights on, no voices. You go in to get a permit, and it’s like everyone’s afraid to speak above a whisper.



8. The Reflection


Maggie Tuttle:

People ask me if I hate him. I don’t. I pity him. He thought control would bring peace. But he didn’t understand that in a small town, control is just another way of falling apart.


Ruth Fenimore:

When folks talk about corruption, they think of money. But here, it was pride. Pride’s quieter — and harder to fix.


Reporter:

You can still feel it in the air, walking past Town Hall. That smell of old paper and fresh paint, the sense that the walls remember. Nobody says “Ashford Hollow” without lowering their voice.


Earl Pinney:

Someone asked me the other day what really happened. I said: “We forgot we were neighbors.” That’s all corruption really is, in a town this small — forgetting who you are to each other.



Small Town Politics - Big Town Issues In Canaan?


If you’ve ever heard people talk about small-town politics, you know that bad things happen even in seemingly quiet, friendly communities.  Public corruption is a problem across the United States… and mirrored in small towns. So what can average every day citizens do about it?

Perhaps more than you think. 

On Saturday and Sunday I had the opportunity to attend local meet and greet bipartisan events for selectmen in Canaan Connecticut. One of the best ways ordinary, unelected people can help make government run more efficiently and transparently is to attend open meetings. Attendance at public meetings in small towns is often low, meaning that few people are fully aware of what’s going on in their town. It’s much easier for elected officials to raise utility rates, award contracts to friends or slip personal agenda items into public policy without the public’s awareness.

I am not suggesting that this is the case in the small Litchfield Hills town of Canaan Connecticut. There are however egos, bruised or otherwise, which hinder an open and bipartisan discussion. Going to a public meeting may not be everyone’s idea of a fun time but doesn’t Canaan deserve better? Is something amiss?

Open, public events, gives us a chance to speak, for or against issues that truly matter to us - such as who our town hires to oversee emergency services, which roads get repaired, how our water plant operates, and how much we pay in utilities. 

Canaan residents can create change by attending these meetings and asking questions of their selectmen. Generally, when people are closely watching what their elected officials are up to, officials tend to behave better. Going to public meetings is one way we can help keep government clean and create change.

And if you don’t like what you hear dig deeper. You can file open records requests to know more about town salaries, how much money the school paid in legal fees, how much given construction projects cost, or almost anything of that nature. By simply requesting these records, people can show public officials that they are keeping an eye on them. Often, the information revealed through a request can shed light on some surprising situations. By law, you can rightfully request and obtain these records.

What I surmised, having attended both meetups, is that one candidate sets himself far apart from the others. His bipartisan position coupled with a written, well constructed agenda and vision for the community constitutes a refreshing change for a better, friendlier, transparent and more tolerant town. More to the point, in a five candidate race, only Jesse Bunce, Ann Talmadge and Christian Allyn verbally illustrated the community needs. The remaining two pointed me to a website, or less. 

So far …Jesse Bunce is the front-runner for me. But I am open to have my mind changed.

Let’s insist on an open debate before it’s too late. It’s easy to do nothing and excuse oneself . But if this town is important, let’s please set aside all petty egos and show the community that our leaders care enough. 



  







PRIVACY BE DAMNED

As a practitioner in the world of big data I am reminded of Zuckerberg’s comment about the users of what is now Facebook as “They trust me” “Dumb F—ks” for giving up their personal data.
Contrary to Wall Street analysts’ suggestion that he has matured, I beg to differ. Analysts have an agenda to keep the stock price momentum going and have no clue (nor do they really care) about the nefarious practices behind the Facebook curtain.
For years I rallied against the intrusions, and yes, theft of the use of our data which most have blindly turned over to Facebook.
Let’s be clear. Facebook did not steal our data. The fine print in their terms allowed them to mine our information legally (if not surreptitiously). In return, we get to use the platform. Such fun!!!
As Facebook executives insist they don’t sell their data, they are correct. They DO sell the USE of our data, and then lose control as the buyer of the data usage integrates third party data to enhance profile targeting down to, yes, even a street address with a more complete profile of YOU …. anonymity be gone.
So what we end up with as the chickens come home to roost is a nest of lies, obfuscated with technical terms, apologies, lack of transparency and accountability and legislators who don’t have a clue how to pull the curtain aside and ask the right questions.
Zuckerberg will not go away as he has overriding voting rights on the business of Facebook. What needs to be done is for clueless legislators to clamp down hard on how this company is undermining the very foundation of what the definition of privacy is …. something Zuckerberg will never openly admit he believes doesn’t exist.

 DOG WALKING APPS: BEWARE
 
The recent spate of news stories surrounding dog walking apps like Wag and Rover prompted a deeper dive into the "Uber" apps of the pet-care business.  And we did not like what we found.

Headlines of run-away dogs seem to pop up more often than we would like to see. As the use of these apps grows, it isn't unusual that mishaps or tragic events will occur. But it seems too often. Why?

It's important to understand that these companies are not pet-care companies.... and they note that in their terms.  If you take the time to read the fine print in their terms and conditions, they will deny any responsibility for mismanaged, hurt or lost pets, passing the responsibility over to their independent contractors who are often not insured or bonded.  We don't paint all walker with the same brush and we assume most under contract are professionals, doing fine jobs.  But accidents happen, and you should be prepared should it concern your furry family member.

While it's in their best interest to manage the fallout from accidents, in the end app companies are not liable.When using these services ask the right questions.  Insist on a meet and greet with the walker before scheduling a walk.  Ask about insurance and who is covered. Ask about vetting the walker.  How long is their training period.  Who trains them?  Are the walks private or pack walks?

The care and safety of your pet should be first and foremost when choosing a company to work with you.  Why choose a distant tech company over a local pet care company?

www.ThePamperedPet.com











  
WAIT, WHAT?!
I laughed.
When Facebook first commented on the small number of Americans who saw the Russian prompted ads at 10 million, I laughed.
I laughed again last week when Facebook upped the number of Americans who saw the ads to 126 million.
Today, Facebook testified on Capitol Hill that the number is now 150 million.
Still laughing.
Facebook, Google and Twitter are compromised. And there is a reason....a lack of seasoned media professionals.
When Facebook first announced10 Million Americans saw the ads and the dollars they took to run them i held back.
Wait, What?!
The numbers simply did not add up and any traditional media pro could have figured that out.
When Facebook upped the number to 126 million and reasoned that it was a small insignificant number I paused and laughed some more. So .... Facebook is telling its advertisers that the millions reached was not a big deal and are taking money from clients to sell insignifigant performance.
Who's crazy here?
It's just the tip of the iceberg and numbers will rise yet again. It will not end well.

Note to Facebook. Google and Twitter .... get off your high horse and hire some seasoned traditional media pros who know the business of reach and math. You simply do not have the chops nor the required foundations to go it alone.










UNPREDICTABLE CRAPSHOOT

Venture capital activity in AdTech reached $514 million in the last month across eleven funding rounds, signaling a strong foundation for 2016 as VCs begin to click open their purses.

The list of investments follows. 

My tendency is to caution VCs on the viability of many of the business models represented here.  As I click on the links to the funded sites, I find myself awash in homogenized, dull, often boring, sometimes confusing presentations of their offerings.

If a site is the face of its business, VCs need to take a hard look at their investments in businesses they are not qualified to vet.

Blippar has raised $54 million in a Series D funding led by Khazanah Nasional Berhad with participation from existing investors.
 
ZoomData has raised $25 million in a Series C round led by Goldman Sachs with participation from other investors.
 
Qubit has raised $40 million i a Series C funding led by Goldman Sachs with participation from other investors.
 
SproutSocial has raised $42 million in a Series C round led by Goldman Sachs with participation from other investors.
 
DataRobot has raised $33 million in a Series B funding led by New Enterprise Associates with participation from other investors.
 
Fuze has raised $112 million in a Series E round from Summit Partners.
 
Geofeedia has raised $17 million in a Series B funding led by Silversmith Capital Partners with participation from existing investors.
 
Hired has raised $40 million in a Series C round led by Lumia Capital with participation from other investors.
 
Snagajob has raised $100 million in a Series D funding led by Rho Acceleration with participation from other investors.
 
Curalate has raised $27.5 million in a Series C round led by New Enterprise Associates with participation from other investors.
 
YourMechanic has raised $24 million in a Series B funding led by SoftBank Capital with participation from other investors.












NEGLIGENCE IS THE CANCER OF CYBER-CRIME

What follows is not only a security breach by hackers, it's a breach of faith and what I would consider negligence by the company and investigators that allowed this to go on for almost four months without alerting those affected.

21st Century Oncology, based in Fort Myers, Fla., operates 145 cancer treatment centers in the United States and 36 in Latin America.

The company, 21st Century Oncology Holdings is warning 2.2 million patients that health data and Social Security numbers were stolen from its computer network.

The breach, which was revealed on March 4, occurred last November and included the theft of patient names, Social Security numbers, physicians’ names, diagnoses and treatment information, and insurance information.

21st Century Oncology said it had to delay notifying patients until after an FBI investigation concluded in November. According to the hospital, intruders gained access to its computer network in October.

In a statement, 21st Century Oncology said, there is no indication patients’ actual medical records were accessed. “Upon learning of the intrusion, we immediately hired a leading forensics firm to support our investigation, assess our systems and bolster security,” said the hospital in a statement.

James Chappell, Digital Shadows’ CTO and co-founder, said hackers were most likely targeting personal identifiable information for resale on black markets. “The circumstances in these patients’ lives were already pretty tough,” Chappell said. “I’m surprised 21st Century Oncology weren’t better stewards of their patients’ data given their circumstances.”

“21st Century Oncology’s response really misses the mark,” said Ted Harrington, executive partner with Independent Security Evaluators, in an email interview. “They note in their statement that no medical records were lost. But patient names, Social Security numbers and other data were. These are some of the most important aspects of the medical record.”

21st Century Oncology is one of several hospitals have been increasingly targeted by criminals. Last month, the Los Angeles-based Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center paid $17,000 in Bit-Coin to attackers that locked down access to the hospital’s electronic medical records system and other computer systems using crypto-ransomware.


Independent Security Evaluators concludes that hospitals desperately need to shore up their cyber defenses and are vulnerable to attack.